Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the perception and activities of the Green Party, which is a political entity. The tone is somewhat confrontational and dismissive, suggesting that those who criticize the Green Party for only being active every four years are themselves not paying attention to ongoing efforts. The intent appears to be to defend the Green Party and criticize those who are perceived as uninformed or disengaged.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the confrontational tone could be seen as dismissive and potentially alienating to those it criticizes. This could be considered a minor violation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others, though it is critical of their engagement level.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a defensive and somewhat accusatory stance, which could hinder constructive dialogue. This is a minor violation.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does criticize a group of people for their perceived lack of engagement. This is a minor alignment with the principle of constructive criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.