Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement is a strong and emotionally charged opinion on a significant public issue, specifically addressing terrorism and the response of global leaders. It calls for a decisive stance against terrorist groups and implies a moral imperative to act. The tone is assertive and uncompromising, aiming to rally support for a firm response to terrorism.
- The statement's aggressive tone and call for action 'no matter the cost' could potentially incite harm, as it does not consider the consequences of such actions on innocent lives. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but it does use strong language that could be interpreted as inflammatory.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it focuses on a combative stance. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a one-sided call to action without room for discussion or differing viewpoints. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to rally support against terrorism, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for the defeat of terrorist groups. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible due to its aggressive and uncompromising tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.