Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with political issues, specifically the Green New Deal and the upcoming election. The tone is critical and somewhat accusatory, suggesting that a public figure plagiarized a policy proposal. The statement also indicates the speaker's voting intention, which is a civic action.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it accuses a public figure of plagiarism without providing evidence, which could be harmful to their reputation. (-2 points)Ā [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the public figure it accuses of plagiarism. (-2 points)Ā [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and dismissive. (-2 points)Ā [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a serious accusation without evidence and does not invite discussion. (-2 points)Ā [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.