The statement by Boris Johnson addresses a significant public issue, namely the conflict between Hamas and Israel, and the political stance of public figures David Lammy and Keir Starmer. It questions their support for Israel and implies a preference for Hamas, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue.
- The statement does not directly incite harm, but the accusatory tone could contribute to a polarized and hostile environment, which indirectly may cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Lammy and Starmer by implying they support a terrorist organization, which could be seen as a form of harassment or defamation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and suspicion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a rhetorical question that implies a serious accusation without evidence, which can be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it makes serious accusations without substantiation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.