In reply to:
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
518d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically electoral politics, voter rights, and policy positions. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to mobilize support against perceived political adversaries.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses inflammatory language ('Dirty Dems') which can contribute to divisiveness and harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in name-calling ('Dirty Dems'), which can be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on rallying support against an opponent rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism; it uses personal attacks ('Dirty Dems') rather than addressing specific issues or policies in a respectful manner. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to mobilize support for a political cause, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by promoting specific policy positions (anti-genocide, pro-worker, climate emergency). [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its inflammatory and accusatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.