Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
518d
The statement by @DrJillStein addresses a public issue by responding to a critique from @AOC, a public figure, about the authenticity and intentions of the Green Party. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with political and societal issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the use of the term 'spicy' suggests a confrontational tone, which could escalate tensions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It addresses a public figure in a public context. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more defensive in nature.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It addresses a specific critique and responds to it. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in public discourse, though the confrontational tone could be seen as less responsible. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.