Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
517d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political figures and their actions, and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement refers to a political figure in a derogatory manner, calling someone a 'War Criminal' without providing context or evidence. This could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it engages in name-calling and potentially defamatory language. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others and avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and inflammatory language, which can polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism. It calls out individuals in a derogatory manner, which violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity. The use of inflammatory language and personal attacks does not uphold the principle of using one's platform responsibly. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.