Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue—namely, the debate over isolationism in U.S. foreign policy. The statement references an essay and a conversation that address the implications of isolationism for the United States' security and prosperity, thus contributing to civic dialogue on a significant policy matter.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. It presents a viewpoint on a policy issue without using harmful language or inciting negative actions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging readers to consider the implications of isolationism. It aims to foster a broader perspective on U.S. foreign policy. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by presenting a reasoned argument against isolationism. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to contribute to a public debate on a significant issue, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for a more engaged foreign policy. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a critical public issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.