Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
516d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political choices and the positions of political figures.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. The use of the term 'pro-genocide' is a severe accusation that can be harmful and inflammatory without substantial evidence. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others. Accusing political figures of supporting genocide is a form of hate speech and can be considered defamatory. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It uses divisive and extreme language that is likely to polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments by labeling political figures with extreme accusations without engaging in a reasoned debate about their policies. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly. While free speech allows for criticism, it should be exercised with integrity and not used to make unfounded or extreme accusations. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.