Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
516d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to an election, political leadership, and voter preferences. The tone is confident and somewhat confrontational, aiming to challenge a political figure and promote an alternative political choice.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as confrontational. It does not explicitly violate the principle of doing no harm, but the tone could be more constructive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It remains within the bounds of respectful discourse, though it is critical. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on political competition and criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in political criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It challenges the leadership qualities of a political figure without attacking their character. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in political discourse. It is responsible in its criticism and does not spread misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.