Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in a public issue by discussing the origins of the 'Green New Deal' and the authenticity of political figures, which contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to intentionally cause harm, but it does imply a negative judgment about AOC's actions, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a public figure, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a personal attack by questioning AOC's authenticity. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as using the platform irresponsibly by making unverified claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.