Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement in question is a reply to a conversation involving public figures and political commentary. It references a tweet by Dr. Jill Stein addressing comments made by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and includes a link to a website. This context suggests that the statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with political issues and public figures.
- The statement itself does not appear to cause harm directly, but the context of the conversation involves criticism which could be harmful if not handled respectfully.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the context of the conversation could potentially lead to such behavior from others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on highlighting a conflict. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more of a reaction to an ongoing conversation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to engage in political discourse, though the responsibility and integrity of the engagement are questionable. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.