In reply to:
emer martin 🍉 🍉 🍉
@emermartin
·
515d
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
516d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the marketing tactics of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in the context of Palestinian children being harmed. The tone is one of agreement and support for the initial criticism of the DNC.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but aligns with a conversation that could be seen as harmful to the DNC's reputation. However, it does not escalate the harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a respectful tone. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of an agreement with a critical stance.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It supports a critical viewpoint without attacking individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.