Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
516d
The statement criticizes a public figure, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), for allegedly appropriating the Green Party's 'Green New Deal' to get elected and then smearing the party. It references a conversation involving Dr. Jill Stein, a prominent figure in the Green Party, who claims AOC called her and the Green Party 'not authentic' and 'predatory.' The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting a betrayal or unethical behavior by AOC.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies unethical behavior by AOC, which could be harmful if unsubstantiated. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It remains within the bounds of political criticism. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is accusatory and divisive. Violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a personal attack on AOC's integrity. Violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it lacks constructive elements and could be seen as spreading unverified claims. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.