Jill Stien

The statement criticizes the Democratic Party and progressives for allegedly suppressing a primary and not discussing single-payer healthcare, while promoting the Green Party as an alternative. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived shortcomings in the Democratic Party's approach to healthcare reform and to promote the Green Party's platform.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('suppressed') that could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of those it criticizes, particularly by naming individuals and groups in a negative context. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding of the Green Party's healthcare platform but does so by criticizing others, which may not foster empathy or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions beyond promoting an alternative party. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to advocate for a specific political agenda, which can be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion for societal betterment. [+1]