Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a significant public issue, specifically the trial of the Uhuru 3 and the perceived lack of response from white leftists. It critiques the Biden administration's actions and frames the situation as a critical free speech issue, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as divisive by calling out a specific group (white leftists).Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call out a specific group, which could be seen as lacking respect for their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of the Uhuru 3 trial, which can be seen as promoting empathy and compassion for the accused. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but rather critiques a broader group for their perceived inaction. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a significant issue, aiming for societal betterment by advocating for free speech and political dissent. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by advocating for the rights of the Uhuru 3 and uses its platform responsibly to highlight a critical issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.