Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
513d
The statement involves a public figure (Dr. Jill Stein) responding to another public figure (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) on a public platform, addressing a public issue related to political authenticity and the Green Party. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone ('Wham!!') which could escalate tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of 'aka #AOCPelosi' could be seen as a derogatory nickname, which may not fully respect the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to celebrate a confrontational response. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It appears to support a combative stance rather than fostering a respectful exchange of ideas. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it encourages a divisive rather than a constructive conversation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.