Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
513d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political figures and their actions, and contributes to the civic dialogue by expressing support for a political candidate and critiquing another public figure.
- The statement does not appear to strive to do no harm, as it uses the term 'attack dog' which is a derogatory metaphor and could be considered harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of AOC by calling her an 'attack dog,' which can be seen as a form of verbal harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and dismissive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack by calling AOC an 'attack dog.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, given the derogatory language used. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.