Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
513d
The statement 'Jill Stein is an infinitely better person and politician than AOC will ever be' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a public debate about the qualities and effectiveness of two political figures, Jill Stein and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC). The statement is part of a broader conversation about political authenticity and the Green Party, which are public issues.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and comparative in a negative way, which can be harmful to the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of AOC by making a comparative judgment that could be seen as derogatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more divisive than constructive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a personal attack rather than a substantive critique of policies or actions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.