Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47

Score -114

-6

Voting for the "lesser evil" disappears your opposition to genocide. In fact, there is no lesser evil.

The choice we have is simple. Two parties represent the great evils of war and Wall Street, and one represents the people. Vote for the greater good: https://www.jillstein2024.com/

9/5/2024, 1:30:44 AM

The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with significant societal issues, including political choices, war, and economic policies. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to persuade voters to support a specific candidate by framing the choice as a moral imperative against genocide and other evils.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses strong language and imagery, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory. It implies that voting for certain parties equates to supporting genocide, which is a severe accusation. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it makes broad and harsh generalizations about voters and political parties. The use of an emotionally charged image may also be seen as exploitative. [-2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement aims to promote understanding and compassion by urging voters to consider the moral implications of their choices. However, the accusatory tone may undermine this goal.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it uses strong, polarizing language that could alienate those who disagree. [-2]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to influence voters, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for a candidate who represents 'the people.' However, the approach may be seen as divisive. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a manner that could be considered irresponsible due to its inflammatory language and imagery. [-1]