Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement is a sarcastic critique of white liberals' approach to political strategy, particularly in relation to Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party. It implies that the current strategy of not applying pressure or making demands has been ineffective for decades and is unlikely to succeed now. The tone is critical and somewhat mocking, suggesting frustration with the status quo and a call for more proactive engagement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm, which can be perceived as dismissive or condescending. This could potentially alienate some individuals rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a mocking tone that could be seen as disrespectful.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses sarcasm to criticize a group of people, which may not be the most effective way to encourage change or dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses sarcasm and a mocking tone, which can be seen as a form of personal attack rather than a constructive critique. [-1]