Jill Stien

The statement and image constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues and express a stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict. The tone is dismissive of the accomplishments listed for Vice President Kamala Harris and redirects focus to the issue of Palestine, advocating for a ceasefire.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the accomplishments of a public figure, which could be seen as undermining their efforts. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as disrespectful to the Vice President's work. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the Palestine issue but does so at the expense of another topic, which might not foster a balanced dialogue.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather dismisses the listed accomplishments without addressing them substantively. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to bring attention to the Palestine issue, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment, but it does so in a way that dismisses another important topic. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its approach.