Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -34
9/5/2024, 9:41:15 PM
X
In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
503d
"NO PROOF" Note that Steele's primary sub-source not only didn't expect him to put his information in report, but that he "made it clear to Steele" that he had "no proof" for his reports:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
503d
PEE TAPE: "JUST TALK" OVER "BEERS" AND IN "JEST"

Horowitz noted the sources of Steele's spiciest revelations, like the "pee tape," were tracked down and stunned they'd been taken seriously. They laughed the story off as "just talk" told over "beers" in "jest":
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
503d
"CORROBORATED LIMITED INFORMATION... MUCH OF THAT WAS PUBLICLY AVAILABLE."

There is NOT ONE piece of original reporting in the Steele dossier that turned out to be true. The only "confirmed" details were from prior public news reports, and even got some of those wrong...
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
503d
THE STEELE DOSSIER IS BULLSHIT BECAUSE:

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, a Barack Obama appointee, conducted an extensive investigation of the issuance of four FISA warrants that required an in-depth review of the Steele dossier:
https://www.justice.gov/storage/…
Dan Smith
@helloimdansmith
·
503d
@mtaibbi In what sense was the Steele dossier bullshit? Are you saying the entire thing was bullshit? Because much of it has been corroborated and confirmed since it was leaked.

Weird of someone with your reputation just dismissing an entire collection of credible info.

The statement and accompanying images engage in a substantive discussion about the credibility and impact of the Steele dossier, which is a significant public issue. The tone is critical and aims to question the validity of the dossier's claims, suggesting that the information was unsubstantiated and possibly misleading. The intent appears to be to inform the public and critique the handling of the dossier by various entities, including the FBI and the media.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the credibility of the dossier rather than attacking individuals personally. However, it could potentially harm reputations if not handled carefully.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or harassment. It focuses on the actions and credibility of public figures and institutions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing detailed information and context about the dossier's credibility issues. However, it could be more empathetic in its tone.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the validity of the dossier and the actions of those involved. It does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques the information and its handling. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges mistakes in the dossier's credibility and the handling of the information by various entities, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to inform the public about potential issues with the dossier, aiming for the betterment of society by promoting transparency and accountability. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly by providing detailed information and context, although the critical tone could be balanced with more empathy and understanding. [+1]