Matt Taibbi

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the credibility and impact of intelligence reports related to significant political events. The tone is critical and aims to question the validity of the Steele dossier and its reception by the intelligence community.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but could contribute to public skepticism about intelligence reports, which may have broader implications.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy of individuals by not disclosing personal information but does critique public figures and institutions.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism and questioning the validity of the reports. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the content and credibility of the reports. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to question the integrity of intelligence reports, which can be seen as an attempt to hold institutions accountable. [+1]