Matt Taibbi

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing the veracity of claims related to the Steele Dossier and allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. The tone is accusatory and aims to challenge the credibility of certain public figures and media reports.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to correct what the author perceives as misinformation, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. However, the accusatory tone could contribute to divisiveness. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call out specific individuals, which could be seen as a violation of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on discrediting others. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a confrontational tone and does not invite discussion or debate. [-2]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes made by the author. It focuses solely on pointing out perceived mistakes by others.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the author's influence to challenge what they see as misinformation, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by promoting truth. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its confrontational tone.