Susan Marie
@salsanbluechips
·
277d
The statement by @BretBaier constitutes public discourse as it engages with the issue of media fairness and the representation of different political viewpoints in public debates. The tone is defensive yet explanatory, aiming to justify the inclusion of diverse perspectives on the show.
- The statement strives to do no harm by explaining the rationale behind the show's decision to include diverse viewpoints, which is a neutral and informative approach. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the show's intent to cover both sides of an election, fostering empathy for the need to hear multiple perspectives. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the criticism without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and responsible use of the platform by ensuring that both sides of an election are represented, which is integral to a fair and balanced public discourse. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.