The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with the issue of censorship, media platforms, and government actions, which are significant public concerns. The tone is analytical and seeks to clarify the nature of censorship in the context of media bans.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual discussion about censorship and media platforms. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying the nature of censorship and the roles of different entities in media bans. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a point of disagreement about what constitutes censorship. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing censorship and media bans, and it uses the platform responsibly to engage in a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.