The statement 'He is 9/10...arguably 10/10... in presidential picks' does not constitute public discourse. It is a lighthearted, conversational remark about a presidential historian's track record in predicting election outcomes. The context provided by the conversation thread indicates that it is part of a casual exchange rather than a substantive engagement with public issues or policies.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does no harm with words and actions.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is not required to in this context.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, but it is not required to in this context.
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes, but it is not required to in this context.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, but it is not required to in this context.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity.