Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114
Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻

The statement '#lockthemup' is a brief, provocative phrase that suggests punitive action against unspecified individuals. Without additional context, it is difficult to determine the exact intent or target of the statement. However, the phrase itself is aggressive and implies a call for incarceration, which can be interpreted as a public stance on a societal issue, potentially related to justice or law enforcement. The link to a website titled 'x.com' does not provide further clarity on the context or content.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement '#lockthemup' can be seen as harmful, as it advocates for punitive action without context or justification, potentially inciting anger or fear. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it calls for incarceration without specifying who or why, which can be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it is divisive and lacks constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a blanket call for punitive action, which can be seen as a form of personal attack or ad hominem argument. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement falls under free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it promotes a punitive stance without context or constructive engagement. [-1]