Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement is a politically charged critique of the Democratic Party, suggesting that they are using 'predatory tactics' to silence opposition and deny voters their preferred choices. It also implies that voters are seeking specific policy options such as anti-war, climate emergency, and pro-worker stances. The tone is accusatory and the intent appears to be to criticize and mobilize against the Democratic Party.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language like 'extremely predatory tactics,' which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory. This does not align with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use accusatory language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a divisive stance. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad accusations without providing specific evidence or engaging in a reasoned debate. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible due to its accusatory and inflammatory tone. [-1]