Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image suggest that social media accounts with large followings are being paid by the Democratic establishment to push a specific narrative about Dr. Jill Stein. The tone is accusatory and implies a coordinated effort to manipulate public opinion. The image supports the claim by highlighting that a PAC is paying influencers to promote pro-Biden messaging. This statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses political strategies and the influence of money in politics.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading distrust and suspicion without concrete evidence. It implies that influencers are not acting independently, which could harm their reputations. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the influencers or the Democratic establishment, as it accuses them of being paid operatives without providing substantial proof. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and suspicion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad accusation without inviting discussion or providing a balanced perspective. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it lacks concrete evidence and promotes a divisive narrative. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.