Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of election integrity and the role of third-party candidates in the democratic process. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that the Democratic Party is undermining democracy by allegedly rigging the election against third-party candidates. The image uses satire to emphasize this point, depicting prominent Democratic figures in a mocking manner.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and image could be seen as harmful as they accuse a political party of undemocratic actions without providing concrete evidence, potentially fostering distrust and division. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement and image do not respect the dignity of the individuals depicted, as they are mocked and ridiculed, which can be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement and image do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, they contribute to a polarized and adversarial political climate. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad accusation without inviting discussion or considering alternative perspectives. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a way that may not contribute to the betterment of society, as it promotes division and distrust. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement upholds the principle of free speech, it does so in a manner that may lack responsibility and integrity, given the accusatory and mocking tone. [-1]