Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
505d
The statement 'Dr. Stein debunks a lot of what Democratic party loyalists lie about.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates, specifically addressing political parties and their actions.
- The statement uses the word 'lie,' which can be seen as harmful and accusatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Democratic party loyalists by accusing them of lying, which could be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it is accusatory and divisive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes a blanket accusation against a group, which can be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does exercise free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity due to its accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.