The statement is a critical response to a discussion about the Steele dossier and its use in FISA warrant applications. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, using strong language to discredit the Steele dossier and those who support its credibility. The intent appears to be to challenge the validity of the dossier and the integrity of those who defend it.
- The statement uses strong and dismissive language ('Bullshit', 'his backside') which can be seen as harmful and disrespectful, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in a dismissive and derogatory manner, violating the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses inflammatory language that can polarize the discussion, thus violating the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and dismissive language rather than addressing the arguments in a respectful manner, thus violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.