Jill Stien

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -112

The statement criticizes the media's portrayal of public interest in policy issues, suggesting that people do care about policies that affect their lives, such as working conditions. It also expresses disdain for what it perceives as 'elite professional doublespeak and optics.' The accompanying image from a news article highlights a poll about political candidates, which ties into the statement's critique of media focus.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a perceived disconnect between media narratives and public concerns, which can be seen as an attempt to do no harm by advocating for more relevant discourse. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language ('craziest lines of recent BS') which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By advocating for a focus on real policy issues, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for those struggling with difficult working conditions. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does criticize the media in a general sense. It could be more constructive by offering specific examples or solutions.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for a focus on substantive issues, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by expressing a critical opinion, but the strong language used could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity.