AreWeThereYet
@JJ79926919
·
495d
The statement by @mtaibbi, 'The DOJ hasn’t “found” anything. They filed an indictment. It could well be proven, but it’s not yet. People often skip this part of criminal justice stories now (not just with this subject but many others),' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to the criminal justice system and the interpretation of legal actions by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The tone is factual and aims to clarify a common misunderstanding about indictments and findings in the legal process.
- The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying a legal process, which is a neutral and informative action. It does not incite harm or violence. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on a legal process rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the difference between an indictment and a proven finding, which can foster a more informed public. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a common misconception without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing a factual clarification that contributes to public understanding. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.