Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they address a significant public issue: the alleged murder of an American citizen by a foreign military and the response (or lack thereof) by the current administration. The tone is accusatory and impassioned, aiming to criticize the Biden-Harris administration for their perceived inaction and complicity.
- The statement aims to hold the administration accountable for their silence, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for justice. However, the accusatory tone may incite anger and division, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the deceased by highlighting her bravery and activism. However, it strongly condemns the administration, which could be seen as a form of political attack. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes empathy and compassion for the victim and other affected individuals, but it does so in a manner that may not foster understanding or constructive dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in strong criticism of the administration, which is a form of public accountability. However, the language used is harsh and could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a serious issue, aiming to influence public opinion and policy for the betterment of society. However, the divisive language may undermine this goal. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.