Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement questions the authenticity of Kamala Harris's policy changes and references a comment by Bernie Sanders. It promotes a discussion on a radio show featuring guests. The tone is skeptical and somewhat provocative, aiming to engage listeners in a political debate.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a polarized political environment. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, focusing on their public roles and actions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on questioning and skepticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue and discussion, which can be constructive, but the tone is somewhat confrontational. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to engage in political discourse, which can be seen as using influence for societal engagement. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by encouraging public debate and discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.