The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of the functionality and influence of the U.S. presidency. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, suggesting that the role of the president has become largely symbolic or irrelevant due to the influence of an unelected bureaucratic machine.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as undermining trust in democratic institutions, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and cynical. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but rather critiques the system as a whole. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint, though it could be argued that it lacks responsibility and integrity by potentially undermining public trust in democratic institutions.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.