Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Piers Morgan Uncensored
@PiersUncensored
·
501d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue involving a political figure and a controversial topic. The tone is dismissive and somewhat confrontational, aiming to counter a narrative presented by another group (#BlueMaga). The intent appears to be to discredit or challenge the significance of a photo involving Jill Stein and Vladimir Putin.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but has a dismissive tone that could contribute to a polarized environment. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on discrediting the opposing view. Violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the opposing view without engaging in meaningful discussion. Violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.