Jill Stien

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -121

The statement critiques a public figure for allegedly forgetting their past involvement with a political party and its candidates. The tone is critical and somewhat accusatory, suggesting a perceived inconsistency in the public figure's actions or statements. The image supports the claim by showing the public figure holding campaign materials for a Green Party candidate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but could be seen as attempting to discredit the public figure. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as undermining the dignity of the public figure by suggesting forgetfulness or inconsistency. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or context for the alleged inconsistency. [-1]