Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue related to election procedures and the actions of the Nevada Supreme Court, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived injustices in the electoral process.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as critical of the Nevada Supreme Court and the Secretary of State. It does not use inflammatory language, so it adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, focusing on the actions of public officials and institutions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of a perceived injustice in the electoral process, which can foster empathy and compassion for those affected by the decision. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Nevada Supreme Court and the Secretary of State but does so without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions and decisions rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to bring attention to an issue of public concern, doing so responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.