In reply to:
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the endorsement of political figures and the influence of the Military Industrial Complex on political parties. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a significant concern about the direction of the Democratic party and its alignment with certain political figures.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language like 'disgraced' and 'puppeteers,' which can be seen as harmful and inflammatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in name-calling and potentially defamatory language. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it resorts to inflammatory language. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.