The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing a historical and political issue related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The tone is assertive and aims to challenge a specific narrative about the conflict's origins. The statement provides a historical perspective that disputes the claim of a 76-year occupation, suggesting instead that the conflict began with the Arab rejection of the 1947 partition plan and subsequent war. The image appears to support this narrative by depicting armed individuals, presumably Arabs, in a historical context.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to correct what the author perceives as a historical inaccuracy, which can be seen as an attempt to do no harm by promoting a factual understanding of history. However, the assertive tone and the use of the term 'myth' could be seen as dismissive of opposing views, potentially causing harm by alienating those who hold different perspectives.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as lacking respect for the privacy and dignity of those who hold the opposing view.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on presenting a counter-narrative, which may not foster constructive dialogue or mutual understanding.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but its dismissive tone towards the opposing view could hinder constructive criticism and dialogue.
[-1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to influence public understanding of a historical issue, which can be seen as an attempt to contribute to the betterment of society by promoting what the author believes to be a factual narrative.
[+1]