Jill Stien

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -121

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to electoral policies, voter choice, and political support. It critiques the increase in ballot access requirements and advocates for ranked-choice voting as a solution to enhance voter choice. The tone is critical but constructive, aiming to highlight perceived inconsistencies in political actions and suggest an alternative approach.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by discussing the impact of policy changes on voter choice and smaller political parties. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by questioning policy decisions and suggesting ranked-choice voting as an alternative. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for electoral reforms that could benefit society by increasing voter choice. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    It upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss public policy issues. [+1]