Jill Stien

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -121

The statement and associated content constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues and promote a specific political campaign. The tone is urgent and critical, aiming to mobilize support and funding for a political cause. The content includes a call to action for donations and emphasizes the campaign's stance on genocide, worker rights, and climate action.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('genocidal duopoly') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory. This could be considered a violation of the principle to strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of the term 'genocidal' could be seen as disrespectful and inflammatory. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy for the campaign's causes (anti-genocide, pro-worker, climate action), but the language used could alienate those who do not share the same views. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement, instead using strong language to criticize other candidates. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to promote a political campaign, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society from the campaign's perspective. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to the inflammatory language used. [-1]