The statement engages in public discourse as it comments on a public issue, specifically Kamala Harris's plan and the endorsement by Goldman Sachs, within the context of a political debate.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies skepticism about the endorsement, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful speech.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It remains within the bounds of respectful discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more critical and skeptical in nature.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the endorsement rather than attacking individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.