Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -126

The statement addresses public issues, specifically the claim about post-birth executions in the US and the situation in Gaza, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, targeting a specific individual (Donald) and a country (Israel). The intent appears to be to correct misinformation and criticize policies related to Gaza.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language ('slaughtered') which can be inflammatory. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a harsh critique without constructive dialogue. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks a constructive approach. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a personal attack ('No Donald') and inflammatory language. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its accusatory and inflammatory nature. [-2]