Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -126

The statement critiques a debate by focusing on the personalities involved rather than the substance of the discussion. It implies that the debate lacks meaningful content and is driven by personal characteristics rather than substantive issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm anyone with words or actions. It is a critique of the debate's quality rather than an attack on individuals.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is dismissive and does not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the debate as lacking substance without providing specific examples or engaging with the arguments presented. [-1]