Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -126

The statement is accusatory and claims that Kamala Harris has admitted that the Inflation Reduction Act is not a climate bill but a cover for expanding fossil fuel projects. The tone is critical and seems intended to provoke debate or controversy, especially in the context of the upcoming 2024 debates.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to misinformation if the claim is not substantiated. It does not strive to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a serious accusation without providing evidence, which could affect the dignity of the person involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it appears to be aimed at discrediting a public figure. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a bold claim without offering a platform for discussion or evidence, which can be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, especially if the claim is unsubstantiated. [-1]